
| Rate This Article: | ||
|
"The decision to take up the issue, which has yielded conflicting opinions in lower federal courts, was posted today on the high court's Web site. Based on their usual timetable, the justices could hear oral arguments next spring and issue a ruling next summer that, regardless of the outcome, promises to affect the presidential election in November 2012."
"A decision voiding the individual mandate would weaken, if not gut, the rest of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). As the Obama administration has acknowledged in court, key provisions that require insurers to provide coverage and charge premiums without regard to preexisting conditions depend on every American being in the insurance risk pool, as opposed to putting off coverage until needed."
"The Supreme Court had received 6 different petitions to rule on the individual mandate from various winners and losers of federal appellate cases. It has chosen to combine 3 of them, all springing from the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Atlanta, Georgia. In August, that court declared that the individual mandate exceeds the authority of Congress to regulate interstate commerce, as granted by the Constitution's Commerce clause. In so many words, it said the government cannot force someone to buy a product or service."
"The appellate court in Atlanta affirmed a thumbs down on the mandate from US District Judge Roger Vinson in Pensacola, Florida, in a case brought by officials from 26 states and the National Federation of Independent Business. However, the appellate court said that Vinson erred when he ruled the entire law unconstitutional because of the tainted requirement to obtain insurance coverage."
"The Supreme Court stated today that it will rule on whether the mandate is severable from the rest of the law."
"The Supreme Court typically intervenes when appellate courts reach opposing conclusions on a legal question, and that has happened with the ACA litigation. Unlike their counterpart in Atlanta, appellate courts in both Washington, DC, and Cincinnati, Ohio, declared that the individual mandate is a constitutionally sound means of correcting the problem of cost-shifting caused by the uninsured, who often receive free or discounted care. Yet another appellate court in Richmond, Virginia, voided 2 lower-court decisions, one against the individual mandate and the other for it, on jurisdictional grounds.""A law called the Anti-Injunction Act ... prohibits legal attempts to restrain the assessment or collection of a tax. The plaintiffs in that particular ACA lawsuit had alleged that the penalty imposed on people foregoing insurance coverage is an improper tax."
"The Obama administration asked the Supreme Court to decide whether the Anti-Injunction Act should block legal challenges to the ACA. The administration has argued that it should not. The Supreme Court said today that it also will take up this question."
We welcome and encourage readers to comment on our content and engage in respectful conversation. Reader comments published here do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of this publisher and we can't vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of comments which are submitted from readers. It is assumed that the reader has permission to post comments.
Due to the volume of comments received, we generally will not review, moderate or edit comments prior to posting. We do reserve the right to edit or delete reader comments either individually or as a group. Because our reader comments are not moderated or edited, we encourage readers to self-police and report illegal or offensive comments to the publisher. Comments may be removed from the site at our discretion.
The screen name submitted by users in the “Name” field of the comment tool will be posted along with the comment. E-mail addresses submitted with reader comments will not be posted with comments.
Privacy Policy
Updated July 10, 2009
Registration
When you register as reader or a paid member, or sign up for a mailing list, we collect your contact information (including your name, address and email address). This information is added to our mailing list so that, from time to time, we can send you information about new features, additions, participation in market research, and information about our advertisers’ products and services. We use the credit card or payment information we acquire from you solely to fulfill your order. It is not stored on our database. We may store your information with outside bulk mail providers whose services we use but are not authorized to use this data for their own purposes.
Profile Creation
Readers may choose to create a public user profile. Elements of the public profile include name, title, industry, skills, professional experience, recent site activity, your personal photograph. Creating a public profile is entirely optional, but enables you to better identify yourself to other readrs and may allow you to participate more fully with some programs such as “Reader of the Day” which is limited to readers who have posted a personal photo.
A word about cookies.
We use cookies so we can recognize you and enable certain features of the site for the purpose of making your visit more enjoyable and convenient. We also provide session tracking cookies that controls your access to certain site functionality. WE DO NOT ATTEMPT TO INVESTIGATE YOUR COMPUTER IN ANY OTHER WAY OR FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE INCLUDING ANY ATTEMPT TO DISCOVER INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR COMPUTER OR EMAIL ACTIVITY.
We may use third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our Web site. Third-party advertising companies track information about your visits to this Web site to serve ads to you. In the course of advertisements being served to you, the third-party advertising company may place or recognize a unique third-party cookie or cookies on your browser.
Please be assured that we are very serious about privacy concerns, and we intend to make every effort guard them.
Thanks,
The Publisher
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||