Exemption Allowing Insurance Restraint of Trade Eyed by Congress
Rate This Article:
1
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
The Associated Press reports in an article found here that "Top Senate Democrats intend to try to strip the health insurance industry of its exemption from federal antitrust laws, according to congressional officials, the latest evidence of a deepening struggle over President Barack Obama's effort to overhaul the health care industry.  If enacted, the switch would mean greater federal regulation for an industry that recently has stepped up its criticism of portions of a health care bill moving toward the Senate floor."

"Congressional officials said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada and Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, arranged to make the announcement Wednesday, joined by Senator Chuck Schumer of New York."

Antitrust laws prohibit agreements by two or more that "restrain trade in interstate commerce." To prevent labor unions from antitrust liability, a "labor exemption" was created under the Clayton Act of 1914. A judicially-derived expansion of the labor exemption that protects union activity from antitrust scrutiny has been the crux of nearly all antitrust actions in professional sports (with the exception of baseball, which had an blanket exemption from antitrust laws until late in 1998). It has been ruled that the exemption applied throughout the negotiation process, even after a labor contract expired. This interpretation of the non-statutory exemption was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1997. [WikiAnswers]

"In a statement, the major industry trade group, America's Health Insurance Plans, said the industry already was one of the most regulated in the country. The focus on the industry's antitrust exemption, it said, was 'a political ploy designed to distract attention away from the real issue of rising health care costs.'"

While the health insurance industry currently enjoys the ability to "restrain trade in interstate commerce", if congress gets their way, the insurance industry may soon have to operate as do all other businesses.

A very good summary of this exemption may be found in this article which points out that while currently the politics of Washington is aiming at the notion that the insurance industry needs competition the problem is that the insurance industry has federal IMMUNITY from competition.

"The federal government has not been able to attack the insurance companies through federal anti-trust laws for over 60 years. Under the McCarran-Ferguson Act passed in 1945, insurance companies (and Major League Baseball!) are specifically excluded from federal anti-trust laws as long as the state regulates in that area, and federal anti-trust laws will apply ONLY in cases of boycott, coercion, and intimidation."

"Under the McCarran-Ferguson Act, Big Insurance is allowed to collect and SHARE data with each other about claims. With this information, Big Insurance can fix prices, set coverage requirements, outline conditions for coverage denials (like pre-existing conditions), and many, many more.  That’s right, folks! Big Insurance can plot together...!"

"Back in 2007 in the wake of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, a bipartisan group went after Big Insurance for the way that it was screwing over homeowners who lost everything in those terrifying storms. Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) introduced the Insurance Industry Competition Act, along with the judiciary panel’s ranking member, Senator Arlen Specter (then R-PA), Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, (D-NV), and Senate Republican Whip Trent Lott, (R-MS)....This bill intended to repeal the McCarran-Ferguson Act. These legislators noted the blatant collusion among Big Insurance and the drought of competition in the insurance industry."

"Big Insurance went nuts... citing all the usual doom and gloom scenarios without providing any foundation for the apocalyptic tales....[and] claimed that taking away their immunity would stifle competition!! ...However, the same bill has been reintroduced this year again by Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-OR). No significant movement has taken place on this bill."

 
Post A Comment
* Indicates Required Field
Comment Title:
* Comments:
Nickname:
* Validation:
Most Recent Comments
 
 
FeaturedNews
Input Sought on Osteoporosis Guidelines
Published 07/28/2010 - 3:00 p.m.  CDT

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force is considering whether to broaden the group of women it recommends to get routine screening for osteoporosis, and it wants physician input. Physicians and others can comment on the draft recommendations through 5 p.m. EST Aug. 3 online
...Read More
ChiroVoice Registration is UP
Published 07/21/2010 - 3:00 p.m.  CDT

ChiroVoice is growing ever larger now up to over 51,000 users.  Texas still ranks seventh in the nation in ChiroVoice Registrations, but our chiropractic colleges rank 12 and 13.

It’s more important than ever that you ask your patients and colleagues to sign-up on ChiroVoice.  Check it out HERE
...Read More
It's OK to Waive EXTRA Medicare Co-Pay, if...
Published 07/21/2010 - 8:02 a.m.  CDT

This article, written by Susan McClelland and distributed by COCSA, reports that it's ok to waive the extra portion of the Medicare co-pay that the 2.2% Medicare pay increase has caused.  Read more of the details in this article.
...Read More
Reader Login
Username:
Password:
 Save Login?
Free Sign-up
Forgot Password?
Reader Control Panel

The Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation (TDI-DWC) is accepting public comment, and has scheduled public hearings, on several rules proposals.  Comment deadline is Monday August 16, 2010.

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force is considering whether to broaden the group of women it recommends to get routine screening for osteoporosis, and it wants physician input. Physicians and others can comment on the draft recommendations through 5 p.m. EST Aug. 3 online

Emergency rooms, the only choice for patients who can't find care elsewhere, may grow even more crowded with longer wait times under the nation's new health law. That might come as a surprise to those who thought getting 32 million more people covered by health insurance would ease ER crowding.

One of the reasons cited includes: "...ER patients ready to be admitted...must compete for beds with patients scheduled for elective surgeries, which bring in more money. "If you've got 10 ER patients and 10 elective surgeries...which are you going to give the beds to?"

A Government task force now says all younger postmenopausal women should get checked if their risk of a broken bone is the same or greater than the average 65-year-old woman. Factors that can increase risk include low weight, certain drugs, smoking, heavy alcohol use and a parent who broke a hip.

Faced with a ballooning deficit in Germany's health care system, Chancellor Angela Merkel's government decided...to raise premiums and cut into the profits of doctors, dentists, hospitals and pharmaceutical manufacturers.

Germany's once highly regarded mandatory health insurance covers about 72 million people, or 90 percent of the population. It has already gone through a series of reforms to stabilize its financial base. Costs are rising swiftly because of ever more sophisticated treatments and an aging population.

Poor health literacy -- an individual's ability to seek, understand, and utilize health information -- has been linked with limited self-management skills, but the influence of health literacy has not previously been investigated in low back pain.

An Australian study investigating this found that among patients with low back pain, negative beliefs and behaviors -- such as believing their problem will not get better -- are important correlates of increased disability.

They also found that patients named health professionals as their primary source for information about low back pain and favored physiotherapists and chiropractors over [medical] care physicians for specialized information.