
| Rate This Article: | ||
|
"Sens. Max Baucus (D-Mont), Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), and Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) asked Daniel Levinson, director of the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) for the Department of Health and Human Services to undertake an evaluation of state medical boards, the first such investigation in 15 years."
"In a letter, the trio outlined a number in instances in which physicians were sanctioned by their employer for wrongdoing -- which included sexual misconduct, malpractice, and fraud -- but did not face any consequences from their state medical board."
"The letter cites a report from the consumer group Public Citizen that found no state licensing disciplinary action against more than half of the 10,672 doctors in the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) who had at least one revocation or restriction of clinical privileges from 1990 to 2009."
"With the adoption of advanced medical technologies ... and an increase in physicians holding licenses in two or more states, it is becoming increasingly important that states issue timely board actions and coordinate licensure actions to protect the public from unqualified or marginally proficient practitioners," the senators wrote in their letter.
"The NPDB tracks actions based on professional competence or conduct that adversely affect a doctor's hospital privileges for more than 30 days. These include reducing, restricting, suspending, revoking, or denying privileges, or firing."
"The database also includes information on voluntary license surrender or restriction of privileges while under investigation, Medicare and Medicaid exclusion reports containing sanctions against a practitioner, and payments made on behalf of physicians in connection with medical liability settlements or judgements."
"Of the nearly 6,000 physicians whose medical boards were seemingly unaware of their tainted record, more than 1,000 were punished for "incompetence, negligence or malpractice;" 605 for providing "substandard care," and 220 because they were deemed "an immediate threat to health or safety."
"Other offenses that resulted in revocation of clinical privileges or other restrictions included sexual misconduct, inability to practice safely, fraud, and narcotics violations."
"In their letter, the senators asked OIG to identify barriers to reporting physician sanctions to state medical boards and to examine how to ensure sanctions are reported to the appropriate medical board."The Federation of State Medical Boards did not respond to a request for comment.
We welcome and encourage readers to comment on our content and engage in respectful conversation. Reader comments published here do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of this publisher and we can't vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of comments which are submitted from readers. It is assumed that the reader has permission to post comments.
Due to the volume of comments received, we generally will not review, moderate or edit comments prior to posting. We do reserve the right to edit or delete reader comments either individually or as a group. Because our reader comments are not moderated or edited, we encourage readers to self-police and report illegal or offensive comments to the publisher. Comments may be removed from the site at our discretion.
The screen name submitted by users in the “Name” field of the comment tool will be posted along with the comment. E-mail addresses submitted with reader comments will not be posted with comments.
Privacy Policy
Updated July 10, 2009
Registration
When you register as reader or a paid member, or sign up for a mailing list, we collect your contact information (including your name, address and email address). This information is added to our mailing list so that, from time to time, we can send you information about new features, additions, participation in market research, and information about our advertisers’ products and services. We use the credit card or payment information we acquire from you solely to fulfill your order. It is not stored on our database. We may store your information with outside bulk mail providers whose services we use but are not authorized to use this data for their own purposes.
Profile Creation
Readers may choose to create a public user profile. Elements of the public profile include name, title, industry, skills, professional experience, recent site activity, your personal photograph. Creating a public profile is entirely optional, but enables you to better identify yourself to other readrs and may allow you to participate more fully with some programs such as “Reader of the Day” which is limited to readers who have posted a personal photo.
A word about cookies.
We use cookies so we can recognize you and enable certain features of the site for the purpose of making your visit more enjoyable and convenient. We also provide session tracking cookies that controls your access to certain site functionality. WE DO NOT ATTEMPT TO INVESTIGATE YOUR COMPUTER IN ANY OTHER WAY OR FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE INCLUDING ANY ATTEMPT TO DISCOVER INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR COMPUTER OR EMAIL ACTIVITY.
We may use third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our Web site. Third-party advertising companies track information about your visits to this Web site to serve ads to you. In the course of advertisements being served to you, the third-party advertising company may place or recognize a unique third-party cookie or cookies on your browser.
Please be assured that we are very serious about privacy concerns, and we intend to make every effort guard them.
Thanks,
The Publisher
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||