
| Rate This Article: | ||
|
"The suit, scheduled to be heard by an Austin state district judge in August, says chiropractors have overstepped their scope of practice, saying misdiagnosis can mean delayed or inappropriate treatment. Diagnosing medical conditions undermines the purpose of the Texas Medical Practice Act, said David Bragg, an attorney for the [medical] association."
"Allowing chiropractors to diagnose a medical condition is beyond their training, scope and expertise," he said. "I do a lot of nursing home neglect cases, and I know a lot about bedsores, but I am by no means qualified to diagnose bed ulcers because I've never been to medical school."
"Such scope-of-practice lawsuits are common in Texas and nationwide," said Ronald Scott, a research professor at the University of Houston Law Center Health Law and Policy Institute. "It's the classic argument of just how much...is reserved for someone with a medical degree....The criteria should be whether or not the profession is safely and appropriately able to perform the procedure or diagnostic test," he said.
Chiropractors say a victory for the association's suit would be a fatal blow to their profession....patients would be left with fewer choices regarding the type of healthcare they receive....'If chiropractors can't diagnose, how are they going to know what to treat the patient for?' asked Kevin Kanz, former president of the Texas Chiropractic Association. 'A doctor of chiropractic must diagnose,' he said."
In 1995, the Legislature prohibited chiropractors from performing surgical procedures or making incisions into any organ, body cavity or tissue. But the Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners issued an opinion saying needle electromyography is allowed, though it involves inserting needles under the skin. The procedure is used to assess the health of muscles and diagnose conditions....The 1995 law also prohibited the chiropractic board from certifying chiropractors to perform spinal manipulation under anesthesia. However, the board took the stance that while the law prohibited it from certifying chiropractors to perform the procedure, it did not prohibit chiropractors from performing it."
"In 1998, the attorney general weighed in, saying using a needle for any purpose other than drawing blood was outside the scope of practice for chiropractors.""In 2006, the Texas Medical Association and Texas Medical Board sued to block the chiropractic board's rules. In November, a judge issued a partial summary judgment, effectively preventing chiropractors from performing the two procedures. A third issue, that of diagnosing medical conditions, was left undecided. The chiropractic association has asked for a jury trial."
Professor Scott said he sees the chiropractors' point: "If they can't say what is wrong based on their training, then how can they appropriately refer patients?"
"At the same time, physicians are saying that patients should go to them in the first place for diagnosis."
"At the heart of the lawsuit has been what the medical association sees as chiropractors' ever-expanding scope of practice...'If chiropractors are allowed to do one thing, they'll keep trying to expand their scope until the line that separates the two professions is completely blurred,' Bragg said. 'It's already happened in other allied health fields,' he said."
"The TMA says Texas law stipulates that chiropractors may analyze, examine or evaluate the biomechanical condition of the spine and musculoskeletal system but that they are prohibited from diagnosing physical diseases, disorders, deformities or injuries."
"'The state decides who should practice medicine, including diagnosing medical conditions based on the person's education and training,' according to Brent Annear, spokesman for the TMA. 'And the state has decided that to diagnose medical conditions in Texas, a medical degree is required.'"
Dale White, a past
president of the state chiropractors association, said "the TMA attacks
podiatrists, psychologists, optometrists and just about anyone who he
says competes with physicians."
"That's one of the things that bothers chiropractors and other allied health professionals the most," Professor Scott said. "From their perspective, medical doctors get to decide what they [chiropractic physicians] do and don't do," he said. "They feel like their voices are not heard."
"The medical association says it isn't worried about competition from chiropractors ...'it's concerned that chiropractors will go from treating problems related to the spine and musculoskeletal system, which they are trained to do, to much more than their education safely warrants,' Bragg said. 'Using the kind of broad language in their rules, it's not such a big leap from working on the spine to the brain,' he said."
"Chiropractors were once characterized as 'bone poppers'...But in recent years some have been treating more than back problems. Some are using lasers...others are providing nutritional advice to address diabetes and the obesity epidemic, an area that had fallen to physicians. Others tout chiropractic as effective for ear infections, infertility and developmental delays in children."
"In the end...this fight is more about money than scope of practice. As
healthcare dollars dwindle...the medical profession is
concerned that chiropractors and other healthcare providers will
infringe on their piece of the pie," Dr. White said.
"Healthcare reform is likely to escalate the debate....The chiropractic association has raised concerns that the American Medical Association is launching a campaign to repeal the provider-nondiscrimination provision in the national health reform law. That would keep people from choosing the type of doctor they want and having their insurance company pay their health bills fairly, White said."
"From the chiropractors' perspective, losing the ability to diagnose medical conditions would mean a drop in income. 'If I can't diagnose, I can't bill the insurance carriers,' White said. Although insurance carriers and Medicare typically cover chiropractic treatments, if chiropractors could not diagnose medical conditions, patients would most likely have to self-pay."
We welcome and encourage readers to comment on our content and engage in respectful conversation. Reader comments published here do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of this publisher and we can't vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of comments which are submitted from readers. It is assumed that the reader has permission to post comments.
Due to the volume of comments received, we generally will not review, moderate or edit comments prior to posting. We do reserve the right to edit or delete reader comments either individually or as a group. Because our reader comments are not moderated or edited, we encourage readers to self-police and report illegal or offensive comments to the publisher. Comments may be removed from the site at our discretion.
The screen name submitted by users in the “Name” field of the comment tool will be posted along with the comment. E-mail addresses submitted with reader comments will not be posted with comments.
Privacy Policy
Updated July 10, 2009
Registration
When you register as reader or a paid member, or sign up for a mailing list, we collect your contact information (including your name, address and email address). This information is added to our mailing list so that, from time to time, we can send you information about new features, additions, participation in market research, and information about our advertisers’ products and services. We use the credit card or payment information we acquire from you solely to fulfill your order. It is not stored on our database. We may store your information with outside bulk mail providers whose services we use but are not authorized to use this data for their own purposes.
Profile Creation
Readers may choose to create a public user profile. Elements of the public profile include name, title, industry, skills, professional experience, recent site activity, your personal photograph. Creating a public profile is entirely optional, but enables you to better identify yourself to other readrs and may allow you to participate more fully with some programs such as “Reader of the Day” which is limited to readers who have posted a personal photo.
A word about cookies.
We use cookies so we can recognize you and enable certain features of the site for the purpose of making your visit more enjoyable and convenient. We also provide session tracking cookies that controls your access to certain site functionality. WE DO NOT ATTEMPT TO INVESTIGATE YOUR COMPUTER IN ANY OTHER WAY OR FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE INCLUDING ANY ATTEMPT TO DISCOVER INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR COMPUTER OR EMAIL ACTIVITY.
We may use third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our Web site. Third-party advertising companies track information about your visits to this Web site to serve ads to you. In the course of advertisements being served to you, the third-party advertising company may place or recognize a unique third-party cookie or cookies on your browser.
Please be assured that we are very serious about privacy concerns, and we intend to make every effort guard them.
Thanks,
The Publisher
|
![]() |
||
|
||
![]() |
||
|
||
![]() |
||
|
||
![]() |
||
|
||
![]() |
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||