
| Rate This Article: | ||
|
Medscape.com REPORTS HERE that "The Texas Medical Board (TMB) has charged a family
physician at the center of a nationally
publicized whistle-blower case involving 2 nurses, with poor medical
judgment, nontherapeutic prescribing, failure to maintain adequate
records, overbilling, witness intimidation, and other violations." You can read our full report on the background of this case in our ARTICLE REPORTED HERE.
"The charges follow a report that the 2 nurses — Anne Mitchell, RN, and Vickilyn Galle, RN — made anonymously to the TMB last year about patient care rendered by Rolando Arafiles, Jr, MD, at Winkler County Memorial Hospital in Kermit, Texas, where the 2 nurses and Dr. Arafiles worked."
"After the TMB contacted him about the report, Dr. Arafiles asked the sheriff of Winkler County to investigate its source. The sheriff, the physician's acknowledged friend and patient, traced the report back to Mitchell and Gale, who were then charged in a state court with misuse of official information, which is a third-degree felony."
"The charge against Galle was dropped, but the hospital fired her as well as Mitchell. In February, a jury found Mitchell not guilty in less than an hour, rejecting the prosecution's argument that she blew the whistle on Dr. Arafiles as part of a personal vendetta.""In a complaint filed last month with a state administrative court, the TMB charged Dr. Arafiles with 9 instances of substandard care. In 1 case, the TMB stated, he sutured part of the rubber from suture-kit scissors to a patient's torn and broken thumb (in his trial testimony, Dr. Arafiles said he was attempting to stabilize the fracture). And when another patient was admitted to the hospital for an abscess caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Dr. Arafiles rubbed an olive oil solution — not on the hospital's formulary and not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for this purpose — on the abscess, according to the TMB. The nurses had reported to the TMB that Dr. Arafiles promoted the use of herbal medicines."
"The TMB also alleged that Dr. Arafiles:
"The attorney representing Dr. Arafiles in the TMB action, Jennifer House, told Medscape Medical News in an email that her client 'certainly denies that he engaged in any questionable medical treatment.' House also wrote that Dr. Arafiles had a constitutional right to 'to seek the involvement of law enforcement personnel with regard to the actions of the nurses in question' and that the decision to criminally prosecute them was not his, but 'a matter of discretion among law enforcement personnel.'"
"The TMB complaint against Dr. Arafiles represents his second run-in with the board. In 2007, the TMB placed a 3-year restriction on his license after determining that he had failed to adequately supervise a physician assistant in his work at a weight-loss clinic and to 'make an independent judgement' about protocols that the clinic owner had developed for treating obesity."
"The board fined Dr. Arafiles $1000 and prohibited him from supervising or delegating prescriptive authority to physician assistants and nurse practitioners, as well as supervising a surgical assistant. He was ordered to complete continuing medical education in ethics, medical records, and the treatment of obesity."
"In the midst of his current dealings with the TMB, Dr. Arafiles is a defendant in a civil suit filed by nurses Anne Mitchell and Vickilyn Galle in federal court. The nurses allege that Dr. Arafiles, their former hospital, and county officials had violated, among other things, their freedom of speech. The defendants deny any wrongdoing in the case."
"The Texas Department of State Health Services also proposed imposing a $15,850 fine on Winkler County Memorial Hospital in April for violations involving an unnamed physician who matches the description of Dr. Arafiles. Part of the proposed fine stemmed from the hospital having fired 2 employees who submitted a physician's patient records to the TMB."
We welcome and encourage readers to comment on our content and engage in respectful conversation. Reader comments published here do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of this publisher and we can't vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of comments which are submitted from readers. It is assumed that the reader has permission to post comments.
Due to the volume of comments received, we generally will not review, moderate or edit comments prior to posting. We do reserve the right to edit or delete reader comments either individually or as a group. Because our reader comments are not moderated or edited, we encourage readers to self-police and report illegal or offensive comments to the publisher. Comments may be removed from the site at our discretion.
The screen name submitted by users in the “Name” field of the comment tool will be posted along with the comment. E-mail addresses submitted with reader comments will not be posted with comments.
Privacy Policy
Updated July 10, 2009
Registration
When you register as reader or a paid member, or sign up for a mailing list, we collect your contact information (including your name, address and email address). This information is added to our mailing list so that, from time to time, we can send you information about new features, additions, participation in market research, and information about our advertisers’ products and services. We use the credit card or payment information we acquire from you solely to fulfill your order. It is not stored on our database. We may store your information with outside bulk mail providers whose services we use but are not authorized to use this data for their own purposes.
Profile Creation
Readers may choose to create a public user profile. Elements of the public profile include name, title, industry, skills, professional experience, recent site activity, your personal photograph. Creating a public profile is entirely optional, but enables you to better identify yourself to other readrs and may allow you to participate more fully with some programs such as “Reader of the Day” which is limited to readers who have posted a personal photo.
A word about cookies.
We use cookies so we can recognize you and enable certain features of the site for the purpose of making your visit more enjoyable and convenient. We also provide session tracking cookies that controls your access to certain site functionality. WE DO NOT ATTEMPT TO INVESTIGATE YOUR COMPUTER IN ANY OTHER WAY OR FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE INCLUDING ANY ATTEMPT TO DISCOVER INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR COMPUTER OR EMAIL ACTIVITY.
We may use third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our Web site. Third-party advertising companies track information about your visits to this Web site to serve ads to you. In the course of advertisements being served to you, the third-party advertising company may place or recognize a unique third-party cookie or cookies on your browser.
Please be assured that we are very serious about privacy concerns, and we intend to make every effort guard them.
Thanks,
The Publisher
|
![]() |
||
|
||
![]() |
||
|
||
![]() |
||
|
||
![]() |
||
|
||
![]() |
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||