| Rate This Article: | ||
|
The Texas Department of Insurance, Division of
Workers’ Compensation (TDI-DWC) is accepting comments on informally proposed rule
28 Texas Administrative Code (TAC) §130.1 regarding Certification of Maximum
Medical Improvement and Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. The informal working draft rule can be
viewed on the TDI website at http://www.tdi.state.tx.us/wc/rules/drafts.html. The comment period closes Monday, March
1, 2010 at 5p.m. (Central Standard Time).
This informal working draft rule is not a formal
rule proposal. Accordingly, your
response will not be treated as a formal public comment for the purposes of the
Administrative Procedure Act. In
addition, you will also have the opportunity to make formal comments after the
rules are formally proposed and officially published in the Texas Register. The TDI-DWC anticipates formal
publication of the rule in calendar year 2010. The informal working draft may contain drafting notes and
formatting which will be changed as necessary to comply with the Texas Register formatting.
Comments may be submitted to TDI-DWC by e-mailing InformalRuleComments@tdi.state.tx.us
or by mailing or delivering the comments to Maria Jimenez at:
Texas Department of
Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation
Workers’ Compensation Counsel,
MS - 4D
7551 Metro Center Drive,
Suite 100
Austin, Texas 78744 -1645
The purpose of the informal working draft rule is
to request input from workers’ compensation system participants regarding the
4th, 5th, and 6th edition of the American
Medical Association (AMA) Guides to
the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. The TDI-DWC plans to propose this rule in order to reflect
changes made by the AMA to the guides for evaluating and determining permanent
impairment.
The TDI-DWC asks that the following be considered
when reviewing the informal working draft rule and when providing comments:
o
Impact on the adequacy of income benefits:
o
Which edition produces impairment ratings that
adequately compensate injured employees for permanent impairments resulting
from a compensable injury under the current statutory income benefit structure
in Texas (i.e., which edition more accurately compensates injured employees for
economic duress that occurs or may occur as a result of the permanent
impairment)?
o
What impact, if any, will a change in the AMA Guides have on the average
impairment rating?
o
Are there categories of injuries that will be
overcompensated or under-compensated when using a certain edition of the AMA Guides?
o
What impact, if any, will a change in the AMA
Guides have on the number of injured employees who qualify for Supplemental
Income Benefits? What are the pros
and cons of that impact, if any?
o
What impact, if any, will a change in the AMA Guides have on Maximum Medical Improvement
(MMI) determinations? Will a
different edition of the AMA Guides
result in earlier determinations of MMI for injured employees?
o
Will the impact, if any, on the adequacy of
income benefits be immediate or will there be a graduated impact over time?
o Impact on return-to-work outcomes:
o Would a change in the AMA Guides have a positive, negative or
no impact on return-to-work outcomes overall?
o If a positive or negative
impact, would this impact be significant and sustaining or temporary?
o If a positive or negative
impact, what categories of injuries or industries will be impacted the most?
o Impact on cost:
o What cost impact, if any,
would a change in the AMA Guides have
on:
Ø Temporary Income Benefits
(TIBs)
Ø Impairment Income Benefits
(IIBs)
Ø Supplemental Income
Benefits (SIBs)
Ø Medical costs (e.g.,
diagnostic tests)
Ø Insurance rates and
premiums
o Will the cost impact, if
any, be immediate or will there be a graduated impact over time?
o Impact on disputes:
o Which edition of the AMA Guides produces better inter-rater
consistency?
o What impact, if any, will a
change in the AMA Guides have on the
number of requests for designated doctor examinations?
o What impact, if any, will a
change in the AMA Guides have on the
number of impairment rating and MMI disputes seen in the workers’ compensation
system?
o Will the dispute impact, if
any, be immediate or will there be a graduated impact over time?
o Impact on health care providers:
o If a change to the AMA Guides was enacted, what training
and testing requirements are needed for evaluating health care providers?
o If a change to the AMA Guides was enacted, what effective
date should be considered to provide adequate time for health care providers to
be trained and tested?
o General impact:
o Overall, what are the
advantages and drawbacks to: 1) staying with the 4th edition; 2) using the 5th
edition; or 3) using the 6th edition of the AMA
Guides?
o Which edition of the AMA Guides most accurately represents
“evidence-based medicine?”
o Does the 5th or 6th edition
of the AMA Guides represent the most
modern medical science in terms of disability evaluation? Why or why not?
If there are any questions regarding the
information in this memo, contact Amy Lee at 512-804-4410 or by e-mail at Amy.Lee@tdi.state.tx.us or Dr.
Bill Defoyd at 512-804-4875 or by e-mail at Bill.Defoyd@tdi.state.tx.us.
We welcome and encourage readers to comment on our content and engage in respectful conversation. Reader comments published here do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of this publisher and we can't vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of comments which are submitted from readers. It is assumed that the reader has permission to post comments.
Due to the volume of comments received, we generally will not review, moderate or edit comments prior to posting. We do reserve the right to edit or delete reader comments either individually or as a group. Because our reader comments are not moderated or edited, we encourage readers to self-police and report illegal or offensive comments to the publisher. Comments may be removed from the site at our discretion.
The screen name submitted by users in the “Name” field of the comment tool will be posted along with the comment. E-mail addresses submitted with reader comments will not be posted with comments.
Privacy Policy
Updated July 10, 2009
Registration
When you register as reader or a paid member, or sign up for a mailing list, we collect your contact information (including your name, address and email address). This information is added to our mailing list so that, from time to time, we can send you information about new features, additions, participation in market research, and information about our advertisers’ products and services. We use the credit card or payment information we acquire from you solely to fulfill your order. It is not stored on our database. We may store your information with outside bulk mail providers whose services we use but are not authorized to use this data for their own purposes.
Profile Creation
Readers may choose to create a public user profile. Elements of the public profile include name, title, industry, skills, professional experience, recent site activity, your personal photograph. Creating a public profile is entirely optional, but enables you to better identify yourself to other readrs and may allow you to participate more fully with some programs such as “Reader of the Day” which is limited to readers who have posted a personal photo.
A word about cookies.
We use cookies so we can recognize you and enable certain features of the site for the purpose of making your visit more enjoyable and convenient. We also provide session tracking cookies that controls your access to certain site functionality. WE DO NOT ATTEMPT TO INVESTIGATE YOUR COMPUTER IN ANY OTHER WAY OR FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE INCLUDING ANY ATTEMPT TO DISCOVER INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR COMPUTER OR EMAIL ACTIVITY.
We may use third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our Web site. Third-party advertising companies track information about your visits to this Web site to serve ads to you. In the course of advertisements being served to you, the third-party advertising company may place or recognize a unique third-party cookie or cookies on your browser.
Please be assured that we are very serious about privacy concerns, and we intend to make every effort guard them.
Thanks,
The Publisher
|
- ChiroVoice Registration is UP
- MEDICARE PECOS DATE....It's time.
- Ft. Worth-Star Telegram Reports on TMA Lawsuit
- Stroke NOT a Risk or Side Effect Says Connecticut Board
- PECOS Date Moved Up!
- The AMA: Some Recent Decisions
- Examination Board Sues Medical Physicians for Cheating
- 6 MONTH REPRIEVE FROM MEDICARE CUTS
- Medicare Cuts DME Prices by 1/3rd.
- Workers Comp Stats and Quotes
- ChiroVoice Registration is UP
- MEDICARE PECOS DATE....It's time.
- Ft. Worth-Star Telegram Reports on TMA Lawsuit
- Stroke NOT a Risk or Side Effect Says Connecticut Board
- PECOS Date Moved Up!
- The AMA: Some Recent Decisions
- Examination Board Sues Medical Physicians for Cheating
- 6 MONTH REPRIEVE FROM MEDICARE CUTS
- Medicare Cuts DME Prices by 1/3rd.
- Workers Comp Stats and Quotes
- Quick, Dumb, Profitable?
- Swiss Chiropractic Doctors and Medication
- Chiropractic Doctor Gets Star Athlete "Back on Track"
- TCA Convention Report
- AMA Meets This Week
- The AMA: The State of THEIR Association
- The AMA: Some Recent Decisions
- Why is "Organized Medicine" Anti-Chiropractic? (2)
- Ghana Supports Chiropractic in Med Schools
- US House Passes Expanding Chiropractic to ALL Major VA Medical Centers
 |
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
 |
